One of life’s great uncertainties is whether we will be remembered after our death, and if so by whom and in what way. For most of us, the best we can hope is that friends and family will think kindly about us once we are gone. To have made a positive impression upon and be well regarded by those who knew us best is no small thing. For a few, records of whose words and deeds will be passed down to posterity, the expectation of lasting fame comes mixed with concern. Will future generations remember them for the great things they achieved, or for some modest act with which they become associated? Will future generations judge them more or less harshly than their contemporaries did? Alfred (d. 899) the Saxon king of England, is now mostly remembered for allowing some cakes to burn, rather than his military victories, his legal and educational reforms, and his scholarship. Richard (d. 1199), the Norman king of England, is celebrated today for his military prowess and piety, whereas the anti-Jewish riots which accompanied his coronation are largely forgotten. Posthumous reputations are beyond the control of those to whom they attach.
Today, David Hume (d. 1776) is considered one of the pre-eminent British philosophers, whose work has greatly influenced not only the course of modern philosophy but also other important areas of social scientific study, notably psychology and economics. During his lifetime, however, he was known primarily as an historian and essayist. His History of England, published in six volumes, was widely discussed during his lifetime but not much today. In a book published in 2008, the Hume scholar Annette Baier (d. 2012) wrote, I have been reading Hume now for sixty years, though it took retirement for me to really read his History of England. Hume’s essays were also popular in his own day, ranging widely in length and subject matter, but mostly concerned with moral, political, and literary matters. Last year, two hundred and eighty years after the first edition of the Essays was published, Oxford University Press issued the first, full critical edition – 1,200 pages in all – including a comprehensive account of the various published versions, with all revisions and deletions included. Despite this new scholarly edition, they remain less familiar to most contemporary philosophers than Hume’s more overtly philosophical writings, which provoked widespread uninterest during his lifetime.
Continue reading “Death and taxes”